[Infrastructures] state machines
Daniel Hagerty
Daniel Hagerty <hag@linnaean.org>
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:52:13 -0400
> Oh sure, I agree with that. But let me ask you: What is more likely
> to have the CNAME dependency problem? A recent backup restored, or
> an old system image with months or years worth of changes applied?
> Perhaps you see what I'm getting at.
You're presumably suggesting that the backup (since it's just data
at this level of abstraction) is more robust than a series of hand
crafted imperative statemnts that you execute in proper order.
The two both have their places. A backup is a large relatively
opaque blob; code that supposedly reproduces the backup is
introspectable in a way the backup is not. One being better than the
other is dependant on the context of use.