[Infrastructures] isconf deprecates infrastructures.org?

Mark Ferlatte ferlatte@cryptio.net
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:40:15 -0700


--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Daniel Hagerty said on Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 04:32:01PM -0400:
>     In any event, you can probably arrive at a workable process for
> what you do to prevent this particular problem given what you're
> already using.  Play some amount of the delta that gets played to
> everything and image it.  Install new machines from the image and play
> new delta from the point of imaging forward and you should arrive at
> the same place.

That's a good point.  There's no reason to maintain a giant journal
forever.

Here's the thing, though; I've more or less got my infrastructure under
control (server/admin ratio of ~ 350:1 currently), but I'm spending time
doing application management, not systems.  For example, mysql _sucks_
at scale; there are no tools to automate replication setup amongst a
spare pool of mysqlds, for example.

This sort of application specific management is what would be the most
useful to me, but most of it seems to require modifications to the code
itself; many software packages seem to require a _lot_ of effort to
shoehorn them into this kind of environment, and it sucks, although far
less than doing this by hand.

I'm continuing to keep an eye on isconf 4, though; it has a lot of
things going for it that I like a lot, and it plus some other glue may
prove to be better than what I've got right now.

M

--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE344vOtZWu2tc1lARAnddAJ0YbIjIi2VWxq2cHaOq8Gw9brvxTgCfYBuY
xr0hS/Tzq1cu3U5Fde4RJoU=
=r005
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT--