[Infrastructures] Entire linux hierarchy maintained in CVS

[Jordan Curzon]

How you any of you mix radmind with the system package management? Do
you only use radmind for configuration, and local packages for
software? Do you ditch the package management all together? Or do you
use package management to manage the radmind loadsets? What are you
experiences with the different approches?

Jordan curzon

On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:28:05 -0500, Patrick M McNeal <mcneal@umich.edu> wrote:
> >> Have you heard about radmind?
> >
> > We use radmind to manage a whole number of Macs and RedHat boxes.
> > It's been mentioned on this list but there hasn't been a lot of
> > traction.
> 
> We're also using radmind to manage our dwindling solaris deployment
> along with our entire UMCE Linux deployment which is based off of linux
> from scratch.
> 
> Unlike CVS and subersion, radmind was designed from the ground up to
> manage all filesystem types.  That includes symlinks, block files,
> character files, etc.  Also, it supports forked files on HFS+.  Since
> radmind is platform independent, a single server can host any
> combination of clients.  For example, our primary radmind server is
> used for linux, solaris and OS X clients.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Infrastructures mailing list
> Infrastructures@mailman.terraluna.org
> http://mailman.terraluna.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructures
>