[Infrastructures] System Installation Suite
James Neal
neal-infrastructures@timestudies.skylab.org
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:48:42 -0800
In message <777056A4A8F1D21180EF0008C7DF75EE01E66850@accnt.sunbelt.org>you writ
e:
>Just curious and wanting some feedback the System Installation Suite. Has
>anyone used it before? Is it viable?
If this is the package formerly known as "VA SystemImager" (I think it
is), then we use it.
It's your basic image-based installer.. It consists of a boot floppy
(which I serve up using dhcp->tftp->grub->more tftp), which copies a
shell script from the install server and runs it. You're pretty much
responsible for that shell script (which in our case partitions the hard
disks and rsyncs over the image), and creating the image (though they
have tools to do that).
The advantages are that it's pretty quick and simple. Create an image
(by either rsyncing a live image, using their tools, or writing a script
that runs debootstrap), create a script that uses that image, and away
you go.
The disadvantages are that it doesn't perform an actual
from-install-media install (like Solaris's Jumpstart, or Debian's FAI),
which I think allows a single configuration to work on a greater variety
of hardware, and that it pretty much leaves YOU responsible for all the
steps of pre and post installation configuration. For example, if you
want a machine with a different partitioning, you must edit your install
script (a normal shell script), change the "sfdisk" lines which
partition the disk, then create a new fstab that matches the new
configuration, and possibly a new bootloader config, among other things.
All that being said, it's still what we use, for the primary reasons
that we've adapted to its strengths and weaknesses and haven't found
anything better.
Hope this helps,
-James